Judgement of taste requires a disinterested stance from "summary" of Critique of Judgement by Immanuel Kant
In order to properly judge the aesthetic value of an object, one must adopt a disinterested stance. This disinterested stance is necessary because it allows the individual to evaluate the object purely based on its intrinsic qualities, rather than being influenced by personal desires or interests. When we approach a work of art with a disinterested attitude, we are able to focus on its formal characteristics, such as harmony, proportion, and unity, without being swayed by external factors. By adopting a disinterested stance, we are able to recognize the universal validity of our judgments of taste. This means that our judgments are not based on individual preferences or subjective feelings, but rather on the inherent beauty or value of the object itself. This universal validity is crucial in the realm of aesthetics, as it allows us to make objective claims about the quality of a work of art that can be understood and appreciated by others. Furthermore, the disinterested stance enables us to experience a sense of pleasure and satisfaction when encountering objects of beauty. This pleasure is not contingent on any personal gain or benefit, but rather arises from the contemplation of the object itself. In this way, the disinterested stance allows us to engage with art in a meaningful and profound way, connecting us to something greater than ourselves.- The concept of judgment of taste requiring a disinterested stance is essential in the realm of aesthetics. By adopting a disinterested attitude, we are able to evaluate the intrinsic qualities of an object, recognize the universal validity of our judgments, and experience a sense of pleasure and satisfaction when encountering objects of beauty. This concept enables us to engage with art in a meaningful and profound way, connecting us to something greater than ourselves.
